District Court, E.D. Washington, 2020

Caldera-Lazo v. Brusic

Caldera-Lazo v. Brusic
District Court, E.D. Washington · Decided April 3, 2020
Caldera-Lazo v. Brusic

Trial Court Opinion

AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON for the Eastern District of Washington Apr O 3, 20 20 NOE CALDERA-LAZO, SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK a.k.a. NOE LAZO CALDERA, ) Plaintiff ) v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-03288-SAB JOSEPH A. BRUSIC, ROBERT UDELL ) and ED CAMPBELL, Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) the amount of dollars ($ ), which includes preyudgment interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

1 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) other: Motion to Stay, ECF No. 3, is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state cour remedies. See Sullivan v. Boerkel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999). The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealability is therefore DENIED.

This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

1 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

A decided by Judge Stanley A. Bastian on a Motion to Stay.

Date: April 3, 2020 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Sara Gore (By) Deputy Clerk Sara Gore

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.