Crandall v. Williams

1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA RANDEL REELE CRANDALL, CASE NO. C18-5341RBL-TLF Plaintiff, ORDER 10 v. 11 J WILLIAMS, 12 Defendant.

14 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Fricke’s Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #31], recommending the DENIAL of Defendant Williams’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 22]. Williams Objects to the R&R [Dkt. # 32], arguing that Crandall’s claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

18 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 19 2. For the reasons articulated in the R&R, Defendant Williams’s Motion for Summary 20 Judgment is DENIED; 3. The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the Williams’s last known address and to 2 Magistrate Judge Fricke.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 3rd day of March, 2020.

A 7 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge