District Court, W.D. Washington, 2020

Schmidt v. Allstate Insurance Company

Schmidt v. Allstate Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided April 8, 2020
Schmidt v. Allstate Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA BRIONNA SCHMIDT, CASE NO. C19-5589RBL Plaintiff, ORDER 10 v. 11 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Schmidt’s Motion to Compel. [Dkt. #19].

The Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

1. If and to the extent it has not done so, Allstate shall immediately produce all claims manuals and other non-privileged documents responsive to Schmidt’s Requests for Production Nos. 4, 5, and 7, subject to the proviso that they shall be used only in connection with this litigation.

19 2. The parties will meet and confer (without a court reporter) and agree on a mutually acceptable date for the 30(b)(6) deposition, and, if necessary, for Schmidt’s deposition.

21 3. The Court will not award fees or sanctions.

22 4. The Court overrules Allstate’s attorney-client privilege and work-product objections to producing documents regarding Allstate’s bases for calculating Schmidt’s insurance policy limits and Allstate’s basis for tendering the balance of Schmidt’s policy limits as a post-litigation undisputed loss payment. The foregoing documents reflect claims-handling activities that are separate from the strategic litigation defenses that are privileged in a UIM case. Richardson v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co., 200 Wn. App. 705, 714–15, 403 P.3d 115, 122 (2017) (citation omitted).

4 Attorneys’ involvement in these claims-handling activities does not render them subject to the attorney-client privilege or the attorney-work product doctrine. Ten Talents Inv. 1, LLC v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co., C12-5849RBL, 2013 WL 1618780, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2013) (citation omitted); Carnahan v. Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity, Inc., 2:17-CV-00086-RSL, 2018 WL 5825310, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 7, 2018) (citations omitted).

5. The parties will remember the lesson of proportionality. Be reasonable, be cordial, be professional. Sign the model protective order and mediate this dispute at the earliest time and in the cheapest manner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 8th day of April, 2020.

A 15 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.