District Court, W.D. Washington, 2020

Bereket v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Bereket v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided April 13, 2020
Bereket v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ABBY BEREKET, individually and on CASE NO. C17-812 RSM behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED 10 Plaintiff, MOTION TO DECERTIFY AND SEND NOTICE TO THE CLASS AND DISMISS 11 v. INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS 12 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25, Defendants.

15 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Decertify and Send Notice to the Class and Dismiss Individual Claims. Dkt. #77. Plaintiff indicates that a recent opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has “effectively rendered Plaintiff Abby Bereket’s claims . . . no longer viable.” Id. at 1 (citing Stimpson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 944 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2019)). Accordingly, Plaintiff asks that the Court “decertify the Class and to provide notice of decertification, including information to Class members about their rights to file individual suits and the applicable statutes of limitations. Plaintiff further moves to dismiss his individual claims with prejudice.” Id. 23 Having considered the unopposed motion and the remainder of the record, the Court finds and ORDERS as follows: 1 1. Within 45 days of this Order, Plaintiff’s counsel SHALL provide notice, to all members 2 of the certified class, of the Court’s action in a form substantially like the proposed 3 “Notice of Decertification of Class Action and Need to Take Action to Preserve Claims” 4 (Dkt. #78 at 5–6).

5 2. The Court DECERTIFIES the class previously certified in the Court’s November 30, 6 2018 Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and Denying Defendant’s 7 Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint (Dkt. #66 at 2–3).

8 3. All of Plaintiff’s claims, as asserted in Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. #1) are DISMISSED 9 with prejudice.

10 4. This matter is CLOSED.

11 Dated this 13th day of April, 2020.

A 15 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.