District Court, W.D. Washington, 2020

Ostrander v. Uttecht

Ostrander v. Uttecht
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided June 24, 2020
Ostrander v. Uttecht

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Edward George Joel Ostrander, CASE NO. 3:20-cv-05450-BHS-DWC 11 Petitioner, ORDER 12 v. Jeffrey A. Uttecht, 14 Respondent.

16 Petitioner Edward George Joel Ostrander, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. 5. In his Petition, Petitioner named the State of Washington as Respondent. See id. The proper respondent to a habeas petition is the “person who has custody over [the petitioner].” 28 U.S.C. § 2242; see also § 2243; Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1992); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). According to his Petition, Petitioner is currently confined at Coyote Ridge Corrections Center (“CRCC”) in Connell, Washington. See Dkt. 5. The Superintendent of CRCC is Jeffrey A. Uttecht.

1 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to substitute Jeffrey A. Uttecht as the Respondent in this action. The Clerk of Court is also directed to update the case title.

3 Dated this 24th day of June, 2020.

A David W. Christel 6 United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.