District Court, W.D. Washington, 2020

Amazon.com Inc v. Oron

Amazon.com Inc v. Oron
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided November 16, 2020
Amazon.com Inc v. Oron

Trial Court Opinion

1 The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, No. 2:19-cv-00523-RSM 11 Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION AND 12 v. ORDER REGARDING ANSWER DEADLINES AND CASE ROY ORON, an individual; MAAYAN SCHEDULE MARZAN (aka MAAYAN ALMOG), an individual; CLICKOMY, LTD., an Israeli NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: company; RASHEED ALI, an individual; NOVEMBER 13, 2020 (LCR 7(d)(1)) PETER BRADFORD, an individual; CASH NETWORK, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; JEFFREY GILES, an individual; DALE BROWN, an individual; FIRST IMPRESSION INTERACTIVE, INC., an Illinois corporation; and JOHN DOES 1–10, Defendants.

21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 Pursuant to LCR 7(d)(1) and LCR 10(g), Plaintiff Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) and Defendants Cash Network, LLC, Rasheed Ali, and Peter Bradford (collectively “Cash Network Defendants”), move the Court to extend the deadlines set in the Court’s Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates (“Scheduling Order”) (Dkt. #64). Shortly after the Scheduling Order was entered, on March 6, 2020 the Cash Network Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Amazon’s First Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. #70). This Court recently denied the Motion to Dismiss on October 20, 2020 (Dkt. #98). While the Motion to Dismiss was pending, the parties paused discovery proceedings pending the outcome of the dispositive issue of jurisdiction. The parties now request an extension to the Scheduling Order to begin discovery and prepare the case for trial. The parties previously sought an extension of the Court’s first scheduling order (“First Scheduling Order”), (Dkt. #40), which the Court granted (Dkt. #64) after Amazon amended its Complaint adding seven new defendants to the case.

9 II. BACKGROUND 10 Amazon filed its Complaint on April 10, 2019 against defendants who have since been dismissed from this lawsuit (Dkt. #1).

12 On October 8, 2019, based on the discovery Amazon conducted to date, Amazon moved for leave to file its First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Dkt. #45). The Court granted Amazon’s motion on October 25, 2019 (Dkt. #51), and Amazon promptly filed the FAC on October 31, 2019 (Dkt. #52). Among other things, the FAC added seven new defendants, including the Cash Network Defendants.1 As a result, on February 5, 2020, the parties moved for the first time to extend the deadlines set in the Court’s First Scheduling Order (Dkt. #40).

18 On February 7, 2020, the Court issued the controlling Scheduling Order (Dkt. #64).

19 On March 6, 2020, the Cash Network Defendants filed the Motion to Dismiss. While waiting for a decision on the dispositive issue of jurisdiction raised in the Motion to Dismiss, the parties conserved resources by postponing merits discovery.2 On October 20, 2020, this Court denied the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #98). Subsequently, on October 29, 2020 Amazon served the Cash Network Defendants with discovery. The parties are now moving forward The Cash Network Defendants are the only remaining defendants in the case are. The other defendants have either had a default judgment entered against them or have been voluntarily dismissed.

2 During this time, Amazon moved for default judgments against defendants that had not yet appeared in the lawsuit, entered into a settlement agreement and voluntarily dismissed its claims against another defendant, and continued to pursue discovery issued to third-parties.

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING with discovery, with less than one month remaining until the current discovery deadline expires. The parties, therefore, wish to adjust the case schedule in order to proceed with the litigation.

4 III. STIPULATED REQUEST 5 Good cause exists to extend the Scheduling Order. This is the second time the parties have requested an extension of the Scheduling Order. After the Court entered the First Scheduling Order (Dkt. #40), seven new defendants were added to the litigation, necessitating the need for additional time for the parties to pursue their claims.

9 After the Court entered the current Scheduling Order (Dkt. #64), the parties paused merits discovery pending a decision on the Cash Network Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

11 Now that the Motion to Dismiss has been denied and the parties are moving forward with discovery, the Scheduling Order does not provide sufficient time for the parties to pursue their claims and defenses by the current case deadlines.

14 Accordingly, Amazon and the Cash Network Defendants jointly request that the Court amend the Scheduling Order as shown below: Current Date New Date 17 JURY TRIAL DATE April 5, 2021 January 31, 2022 18 Disclosure of expert testimony under October 9, 2020 September 3, 2021 FRCP 26(a)(2) Deadline for filing motions related November 9, 2020 July 2, 2021 20 to fact discovery Fact discovery completed by December 9, 2020 August 6, 2021 22 All dispositive motions must be filed January 11, 2021 October 8, 2021 by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the fourth Friday 24 thereafter Mediation per LCR 39.1(c)(3), if February 26, 2021 November 5, 2021 25 requested by the parties, held no later than STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 1 Current Date New Date All motions in limine must be filed March 8, 2021 December 3, 2021 2 by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the third Friday thereafter 4 Agreed pretrial order due March 24, 2021 January 7, 2022 Trial briefs, proposed voir dire March 31, 2021 January 14, 2022 6 questions, jury instructions, neutral statement of the case, and trial 7 exhibits due DATED this 13th day of November, 2020.

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS By s/ Tim Cunningham By s/ Chad S Pehrson 12 Bonnie E. MacNaughton, WSBA #36110 Chad S Pehrson Tim Cunningham, WSBA #50244 Michael Trent Hoppe 13 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 101 South 200 East, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 14 Tel: (206) 622-3150 Tel: (801) 532-7840 Fax: (206) 757-7700 Email: [email protected] 15 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 16 [email protected] Mark P Walters Kevin Edward Regan Attorneys for Plaintiff Amazon.com, Inc. LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC 5th Avenue, Suite 4800 18 Seattle, WA 98104-7009 Tel: (206) 381-3300 19 Fax: (206) 381-3301 Email: [email protected] 20 [email protected] 21 Attorneys for Defendants Cash Network, LLC, Rasheed Ali, and Peter Bradford STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 1 ORDER 2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 DATED this 16th day of November, 2020.

5 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 7 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that on November 13, 2020, a copy of this pleading was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all counsel of record via the court’s electronic filing system.

s/ Tim Cunningham 7 Tim Cunningham STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.