District Court, W.D. Washington, 2021

Cave Man Kitchens Inc v. Caveman Foods, LLC

Cave Man Kitchens Inc v. Caveman Foods, LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided February 24, 2021
Cave Man Kitchens Inc v. Caveman Foods, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE CAVE MAN KITCHENS INC, Plaintiff, C18-1274 TSZ v. MINUTE ORDER CAVEMAN FOODS LLC, 11 Defendant.

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) The parties’ proposed judgment, docket no. 134, will not be entered by the Court in its present form. The parties have provided no basis for the Court to make the certification required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) to enter partial judgment.

The parties’ stipulation proposes (i) dismissing without prejudice and expressly preserving Counts II, IV, VI, VII, and VIII of Defendant’s counterclaims “in the event . . .

Plaintiff’s claims survive appeal” and (ii) preserving the parties’ claims for costs, again contingent on the outcome of that appeal—which necessarily requires this Court to enter judgment as to fewer than all claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation Dist., 859 F.3d 789, 798 (9th Cir. 2017). The parties’ stipulation attempts to “artificially ‘manufactur[e]’ finality” by keeping Defendant’s dismissed counterclaims “on ice while appeal [is being] taken from a partial judgment,” thereby “circumventing the final judgment rule and arrogating to the parties [this Court’s] gatekeeping role.” James v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., 283 F.3d 1064, 1066 (9th Cir. 2002).

The Court will entertain a renewed proposed judgment only after Defendant’s aforementioned counterclaims have been resolved, including by a stipulated voluntary dismissal of such counterclaims, with or without prejudice, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal.

1 (2) The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and to file a Joint Status Report by Friday, March 5, 2021, indicating (i) whether Defendant’s remaining counterclaims (Counts II, IV, VI, VII, and VIII) will be tried by the Court without a jury, (ii) when the parties will be prepared to proceed to trial, and (iii) whether the trial can be conducted remotely via the ZoomGov.com platform.

4 (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record.

Dated this 24th day of February, 2021.

William M. McCool Clerk s/Gail Glass Deputy Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.