Simatic v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 10 JENNIFER SIMATIC, CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05180-MJP-JRC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE PROPOSED 12 v. BRIEFING SCHEDULE 13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

16 The District Court has referred this case to the undersigned. Dkt. 19. The matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint status report (Dkt. 20) and plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. 25).

19 In the joint status report, plaintiff, who is pro se, states that she wishes to obtain discovery on her Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) claims. Dkt. 20, at 3–4. Defendant takes the position that discovery is unavailable in this case. Dkt. 20, at 4. Defendant proposes that the parties stipulate to a proposed summary judgment briefing schedule. Dkt. 20, at 6.

1 Generally, in lieu of discovery, the defendant in a FOIA case will supply declarations explaining the agency’s search process, which documents were withheld, why the documents were withheld, and why disclosure would damage the interest protected by a claimed statutory exemption. See Withey v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, No. C18-1635-JCC, 2020 WL 885974, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 24, 2020) (citing authorities and explaining that “[i]n FOIA cases, the general rule is that discovery is unavailable”). “Summary judgment is the procedural vehicle by which nearly all FOIA cases are resolved.” Shannahan v. I.R.S., 637 F. Supp. 2d 902, 912 (W.D. 8 Wash. 2009) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted).

9 Therefore, the Court directs the parties to confer and to provide this Court with a proposed summary judgment briefing schedule. The parties shall provide a proposed briefing schedule on or before August 13, 2021.

12 A copy of this Order shall be mailed to plaintiff.

13 Dated this 14th day of July, 2021.

A J. Richard Creatura Chief United States Magistrate Judge