District Court, W.D. Washington, 2021

Cooper v. Agrify Corporation

Cooper v. Agrify Corporation
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided July 27, 2021
Cooper v. Agrify Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE NICHOLAS COOPER, et al., Cause No. C21-0061RSL-JRC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND AGRIFY CORPORATION, RECOMMENDATION Defendant.

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Richard Creatura, United States Chief Magistrate Judge, the parties’ objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in part. Specifically, the Court dismisses Claim 2 because the commissions, equity, and shares at issue had not accrued at the time of termination and were not, therefore, wrongfully withheld under Georgia’s wage payment provision, O.C.G.A. § 34-7-2.

The Court also dismisses claim 12, but grants leave to amend this claim. Any amended complaint must be filed within 21 days of this Order.

23 All other causes of action are referred back to Judge Creatura for all pretrial matters. The Court finds that a reference to the American Arbitration Association rules in the subject arbitration clause does not constitute clear and unmistakable evidence that the parties agreed to ORDER ADOPTING IN PART arbitrate arbitrability where (a) there is no indication that the party objecting to delegation is sophisticated or otherwise could reasonably be presumed to understand the import of such a reference (see Brennan v. Opus Bank, 796 F.3d 1125, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2015); Money Mailer, LLC v. Brewer, C15-1215RSL, 2016 WL 1393492, at * 2 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 8, 2016)) and (b) mutual assent appears to be lacking under Washington law because the objecting party was not given an opportunity to read the rules at the time they purportedly agreed to them (see Burnett v. Pagliacci Pizza, Inc., 196 Wn.2d 38, 49-51 (2020); Hastings v. Unikrn, Inc., 12 Wn. 9 App.2d 1072, 2020 WL 1640250, at *7-8 (2020); McMinimee v. Yakima Sch. Dist. No. 7, No. 1:18-CV-3073-TOR, 2021 WL 1559369, at * 21 (E.D. Wash. Mar. 26, 2021)). The Court expresses no opinion on whether the Weinstein release is enforceable, finding only that the record lacks clear and unmistakable evidence of a mutual intent to arbitrate arbitrability.

15 A copy of this Order shall be sent to Judge Creatura.

17 Dated this 27th day of July, 2021.

Robert S. Lasnik 19 United States District Judge ORDER ADOPTING IN PART

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.