District Court, W.D. Washington, 2021

Olberg v. Allstate Insurance Company

Olberg v. Allstate Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided July 30, 2021
Olberg v. Allstate Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE JEFF OLBERG, et al., CASE NO. C18-0573-JCC Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to seal (Dkt. No. 159). Having thoroughly considered the briefing and the relevant record, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the reasons explained herein.

Consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, Local Civil Rule 5(g), and the protective orders entered in this matter (Dkt. Nos. 32, 83), Plaintiffs file redacted opposition and reply briefs (Dkt. Nos. 160, 164), along with sealed unredacted versions of the briefs (Dkt. Nos. 162, 166), and sealed supporting exhibits containing information not capable of redaction (Dkt.

Nos. 163, 167). Defendant CCC Intelligent Solutions, Inc. (“CCC”) asserts the documents contain proprietary information that could be used by competitors if made publicly available. (See generally Dkt. No. 170.)

The Court starts from the position that “[t]here is a strong presumption of public access to [its] files.” W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 5(g). This presumption applies particularly to “dispositive pleadings” such as CCC’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 136). Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006). Therefore, to overcome this presumption, there must be a “compelling reason” for sealing that is “sufficient to outweigh the public’s interest in disclosure.” Id. Here, the Court’s finds compelling reasons to justify maintaining Plaintiffs’ filings under seal, namely, the proprietary nature of the information as it relates to CCC. The information has little public value beyond its value to CCC’s competitors. (See Dkt.

8 No. 170 at 5.)

9 Plaintiff’s motion to seal (Dkt. No. 159) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain under seal Docket Numbers 162, 163, 166, 167.

12 DATED this 30th day of July 2021.

A John C. Coughenour 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.