District Court, W.D. Washington, 2021

Sifuentes v. Nautilus Inc

Sifuentes v. Nautilus Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided November 29, 2021
Sifuentes v. Nautilus Inc

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 10 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III, CASE NO. C21-5613JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. NAUTILUS, INC., Defendant.

15 Before the court is Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes, III’s motion for default judgment against Defendant Nautilus, Inc. (Mot. (Dkt. # 15).) The court has reviewed Mr. Sifuentes’s motion, the balance of the record, and the applicable law. Being fully advised, the court DENIES Mr. Sifuentes’s motion.

19 The Local Civil Rules provide specific requirements for a party seeking default judgment, and Mr. Sifuentes has not satisfied those requirements. See Local Rules W.D.

21 Wash. LCR 55. Local Rule 55(b)(1) states: “No motion for judgment by default should be filed against any party unless the court has previously granted a motion for default against that party pursuant to LCR 55(a) or unless default otherwise has been entered.”

2 Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 55(b)(1). Thus, before it may consider a motion for default judgment, the court must have previously granted a motion for default. See id. 4 Further, as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 also requires a “two-step process” consisting of: (1) seeking a clerk’s entry of default, and (2) filing a motion for the entry of default judgment. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986) (“Eitel apparently fails to understand the two-step process required by Rule 55.”); see also Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 9 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting that Rules 55(a) and (b) provide a two-step process for obtaining a default judgment); Norman v. Small, No. 09cv2235 WQH, 2010 WL 11 5173683, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2010) (denying the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment because the clerk had not yet entered a default).

13 Accordingly, the court DENIES Mr. Sifuentes’s motion for default judgment (Dkt.

14 # 15) without prejudice to seeking default judgment in accordance with the Local Civil Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

16 Dated this 29th day of November, 2021.

A 19 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.