Fader v. Berrada
Trial Court Opinion
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT TACOMA KEVIN JOSEPH FADER, Case No. 21-5264-TSZ-TLF 7 Plaintiff, v. ORDER SETTING AMENDED 8 COMPLAINT DEADLINE DRISS BERRADA, Defendant.
11 This matter comes before the Court on the Court’s Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Dkt. 24. The Court has referred this matter to the undersigned for further proceedings. Dkt. 24.
14 The Court sets the following deadline for plaintiff to file an amended complaint to cure, if possible, the deficiencies in the complaint identified in the Court’s previous Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23) and the Court’s Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 24): February 4, 2022.
18 If an amended complaint is filed, it must be legibly written or retyped in its entirety and contain the same case number. Any cause of action alleged in the original complaint that is not alleged in the amended complaint is waived. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds, Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2012). If plaintiff files an amended complaint, the Court will screen plaintiff’s complaint and address any other remaining referred issues.
1 The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the parties in this action.
2 Dated this 4th day of January, 2022.
A Theresa L. Fricke 6 United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.