District Court, W.D. Washington, 2022

Madhavan v. Jaddou

Madhavan v. Jaddou
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided September 9, 2022
Madhavan v. Jaddou

Trial Court Opinion

District Judge Thomas S. Zilly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE PRITISH MADHAVAN, et al., No. 2:22-cv-933-TSZ 11 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES 12 v. UR JADDOU, Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, Defendants.

19 The parties, by and through counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 7(l), and 10(g), jointly stipulate and move for a one-week extension of the noting dates and the submission of Plaintiffs’ reply briefs for their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction/Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 15) and Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 16).

23 The parties further stipulate and move for a two-week extension to Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint. For good cause, the parties request that the deadlines be extended until September 16, 2022, and September 27, 2022, respectively.

26 A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Continuing pretrial STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS - 1 UNITED STAT ES ATTORNEY and trial dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). The parties are discussing the potential resolution of this matter which, if reached, would eliminate the need for additional judicial intervention. However, the parties require additional time to do so. 5 To provide the parties with sufficient time to confer, the parties request the following short extensions: Deadline Current Date New Date Noting Date/ Plaintiffs’ Reply September 9, 2022 September 16, 2022 Briefs for Dkt. Nos. 15, 16 Defendants’ Response to the September 13, 2022 September 27, 2022 Complaint Dated: September 9, 2022 Respectfully submitted, NICHOLAS W. BROWN 14 United States Attorney 15 s/Michelle R. Lambert MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 16 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 18 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Phone: 206-428-3824 19 Email: [email protected] 20 Attorneys for Defendants

22 /s/ Kripa Upadhyay KRIPA UPADHYAY, WSBA #40063 23 Orbit Law, PLLC 2459 152nd Ave. NE, Suite 17-2459 24 Redmond, WA 98052 [email protected] (206) 623-3352 STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS - 2 UNITED STAT ES ATTORNEY s/Charles H. Kuck CHARLES H. KUCK, GSBA #40063 2 Kuck Baxter Immigration, LLC Northridge Rd, Suite 300 3 Atlanta, GA 30350 [email protected] 4 (404) 816-8611 Pro Hac Vice 6 s/Jonathan Wasden JONATHAN WASDEN, PBA 199563 7 Wasden, Bless & Forney, LLC 3675 Market St., Suite 200 8 Philadelphia, PA 19104 [email protected] (267) 244-8244 10 Pro Hac Vice 11 s/Aaron Hall AARON HALL; CBA #40376 12 Joseph & Hall, P.C.

12203 E. Second Ave. Aurora, CO 80011 14 [email protected] (303) 297-9171 15 Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs

27 STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS - 3 UNITED STAT ES ATTORNEY 1 ORDER 2 The stipulated motion for extension (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 15) and class certification (Dkt. No. 16) are RENOTED for September 16, 2022. Defendants’ response to the complaint is due on or before September 27, 2022. It is so ORDERED.

DATED this 9th day of September, 2022.

A Thomas S. Zilly 11 United States District Judge STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS - 4 UNITED STAT ES ATTORNEY

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.