Toycen v. Yakima County Jail

FILED IN THE 2 U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON May 16, 2023 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BILLY EDWARD TOYCEN, No. 1:22-cv-03192-MKD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO LCivR 41(b)(2) 9 v. YAKIMA COUNTY JAIL, CITY OF UNION GAP, CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL COURT, YAKIMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, YAKIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and U.S. DISTRICT COURT, Defendants.

15 By Order filed February 13, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff Billy Edward Toycen to show cause why his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, should be granted. ECF No. 6. The Clerk of Court mailed Plaintiff a copy of this Order to the residential address he had provided, but it was returned as undeliverable on March 10, 2023. ECF No. 7.

20 Local Civil Rule 41(b)(2) requires a pro se litigant to keep the Court and opposing parties advised as to his current mailing address. If mail directed to a pro se plaintiff is returned by the Postal Service, he has sixty (60) days to notify the Court and opposing parties of his current address or the Court may dismiss the action. LCivR 41(b)(2).

5 The Court has an interest in managing its docket and in the prompt resolution of civil matters. See Destfino v. Reiswig, 630 F.3d 952, 959 (9th Cir. 2011) (affirming district court’s inherent power to control its docket); see also Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-44 (9th Cir. 2002) (discussing factors to consider in dismissing a claim for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order, including the public’s interest in expeditious resolution, the court’s need to manage its docket, and the risk of prejudice to defendants). Plaintiff has failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address.

13 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 14 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to LCivR 41(b)(2).

16 2. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order could not be taken in good faith and would lack any arguable basis in law or fact.

1 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment, provide copies to Plaintiff at his last known address, and CLOSE the file.

4 DATED May 16, 2023.

5 s/Mary K. Dimke MARY K. DIMKE 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE