Ferguson v. T-Mobile USA Inc

1 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

TAMARA FERGUSON and BRIAN HEINZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, No. 2:23-cv-142-JCC Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 11 ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING v. THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON 12 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION’S T-MOBILE USA, INC., RULING ON THE PENDING 13 MOTION TO TRANSFER Defendant.

14 NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: March 2, 2023 16 Under Western District of Washington Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), Plaintiffs Tamara Ferguson and Brian Heinz and Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc., move the Court to stay all proceedings and deadlines in this action until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) rules on the pending petition to transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (“Petition”). See In re T-Mobile 2022 Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig. (“In re: T-Mobile”), MDL No. 3073 (ECF No. 1). If the JPML denies the Petition, T-Mobile’s response to the Complaint will be due 30 days from that denial. In support of this motion, the Parties state: 23 STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Perkins Coie LLP (No. 2:23-cv-142-JCC) - 1 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 1 Plaintiffs filed this case on January 31, 2023. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs allege T-Mobile failed to adequately safeguard the personal information of its customers from a criminal third-party actor. Id. The plaintiffs in more than 10 putative class actions have made similar allegations against T-Mobile based on the same data-security incident. See In re T-Mobile, MDL No. 3073 (ECF No. 1-1). Those cases are pending in at least nine federal judicial districts. See In re T-Mobile, MDL No. 3037 (ECF No. 1-2).

7 This Court recently stayed a related case against T-Mobile pending the JPML’s transfer ruling. Dollson v. T-Mobile US, Inc., No. 1:23-cv-172 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023) (ECF No. 24).

9 And other courts in this district have previously done the same. E.g., Daruwalla v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01118-BJR (W.D. Wash. Oct. 29, 2021) (ECF No. 39); Rogoff v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-CV-01157-BJR, 2021 WL 5279921, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2021). Courts in this district have also recognized that conserving resources presents good cause for a stay when there is a pending JPML petition.1 14 This case was noticed to the JPML as related to Clark v. T-Mobile US, Inc., No. 2:23-cv- 00103 (W.D. Wash.). See In re: T-Mobile, MDL No. 3073 (ECF No. 1-2). Because it is possible the JPML will grant the pending Petition to transfer and coordinate or consolidate the related cases—including this one—for pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the Parties think staying this case will conserve their resources and the Court’s. See Daruwalla, No. 2:21-cv-01118- See, e.g., Donovan v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01138-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sept. 20, 2021) (ECF No. 13); Akins v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01179-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sept. 20, 2021) (ECF No. 11); Hughes v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01139-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sept. 20, 2021) (ECF No. 15); Villalon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21- cv-1148-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sept. 20, 2021) (ECF No. 13); Espanoza v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-1119-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sept. 20, 2021) (ECF No. 30); Huerta v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01183-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sept. 29, 2021) (ECF No. 10); Brackman v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01277-BJR (W.D. Wash. Oct. 6, 2021) (ECF No. 13); Schupler v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2:21-01161-BJR (W.D. Wash. Nov. 1, 2021) (ECF No. 9).

23 STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Perkins Coie LLP (No. 2:23-cv-142-JCC) - 2 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 BJR (ECF No. 39). Under these circumstances, “[c]ourts frequently grant stays pending a decision by the MDL Panel regarding whether to transfer a case.” Good v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 5 F. 3 Supp. 2d 804, 809 (N.D. Cal. 1998).

4 The Court should grant the Parties a short stay of proceedings until the JPML rules on the Petition. And if the JPML denies the Petition, T-Mobile’s response to the Complaint will be due 30 days from that denial.

7 Dated: March 2, 2023 By: /s/Kaleigh N. Boyd By: /s/ Lauren J. Tsujij 10 Kim D. Stephens, P.S., WSBA No. 11984 Lauren J. Tsuji, WSBA No. 55839 Jason T. Dennett, WSBA No. 30686 PERKINS COIE LLP 11 Kaleigh N. Boyd, WSBA No. 52684 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC Seattle, WA 98101-3099 12 1200 5th Avenue, Suite 1700 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Seattle, WA 98101 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 13 Telephone: (206) 682-5600 Email: [email protected] [email protected] 14 [email protected] Kristine McAlister Brown (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected] Donald Houser (Pro Hac Vice) 15 ALSTON & BIRD LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1201 West Peachtree Street 16 Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 17 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 E-Mail: [email protected] 18 [email protected] 19 Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. 23 STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Perkins Coie LLP (No. 2:23-cv-142-JCC) - 3 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 2 [ PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 3rd day of March 2023.

A 8 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presented By: Lauren J. Tsuji, WSBA No. 55839 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Email: [email protected] Kristine McAlister Brown (Pro Hac Vice) Donald Houser (Pro Hac Vice) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

23 STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Perkins Coie LLP (No. 2:23-cv-142-JCC) - 4 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099