Hagos v. Goodwill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE DANIEL TEKLEMARIAM HAGOS, Case No. C22-1436RSL-DWC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING 11 v. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION GOODWILL, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel (Dkt. # 17). The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: 19 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.1 20 (2) The Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

21 Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed.

22 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Hon. David 23 W. Christel.

25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 For clarity, the Court notes that: (1) the citation on page 3, line 2-3 should be to “Leer, 844 F.2d 27 at 633-34”; (2) the citation on page 3, line 12-13 should be to “Peng v. Mei Chin Penghu, 335 F.3d 970, 980 (9th Cir. 2003)”; and (3) the citation on page 4, line 7 should be to “Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-91.”

2 DATED this 7th day of March, 2023.

4 A Robert S. Lasnik 6 United States District Judge