District Court, W.D. Washington, 2023

Wright v. Pierce County of the State of Washington

Wright v. Pierce County of the State of Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided April 26, 2023
Wright v. Pierce County of the State of Washington

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 10 JOSEPH SCOTT WRIGHT, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-05621-LK-GJL 11 Petitioner, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 SUBSTITUTE PROPER ED TROYER, RESPONDENT Respondent.

15 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court is Respondent’s Motion to Substitute Proper Respondent. Dkt. 20. In the Motion, Respondent informs the Court that Petitioner is no longer incarcerated at the Pierce County Jail and, therefore, Pierce County Sheriff Ed Troyer is no longer the proper respondent in this habeas action. See Dkt. 20. Respondent requests the court substitute the proper respondent— Superintendent Jason Bennett at Stafford Creek Corrections Center—in this matter. Id. Upon review, the Court agrees Superintendent Bennett is the proper respondent and grants the motion.

22 The proper respondent to a habeas petition is the “person who has custody over [the petitioner].” 28 U.S.C. § 2242; see also § 2243; Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1992); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). At the time Petitioner filed his Petition, he was being held in the Pierce County Jail as a pretrial detainee. See Dkt. 1. However, in November 2022, Petitioner was transferred to the custody of the Department of Corrections to begin serving his state sentence. See Dkt. 20. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center. See id. As such, the Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center is now the proper respondent in this matter. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 435 (2004) (the person having custody of the person detained for purposes of § 2254 is typically the warden of the facility where the petitioner is incarcerated).

9 The motion to substitute (Dkt. 20) is granted. The Clerk is directed to substitute the correct respondent—Superintendent Jason Bennett at Stafford Creek Corrections Center—in this matter.

12 Dated this 26th day of April, 2023.

A 15 Grady J. Leupold United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.