Benshoof v. Admon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE KURT A. BENSHOOF, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C23-1392 JNW 10 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MOSHE ADMON, et al., 12 Defendants.

14 Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. (Dkt. # 1.) In the IFP application, Plaintiff indicates he is not employed and has received no money from any source for the past twelve months. (Id. at 1.) However, Plaintiff lists monthly expenses totaling $1,005 and states he has $2,168 in cash and $185.07 in checking and savings accounts. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff also states he owns a vehicle worth $25,000.

19 (Id.) Asked to provide any other information explaining why he cannot pay court fees and costs, Plaintiff states he is “living under threat of immediate unlawful arrest, effectively imprisoned in [his] own home, due to the ongoing criminal conspiracy of civil rights violations perpetrated.”

22 (Id.) 1 The district court may permit indigent litigants to proceed IFP upon completion of a proper affidavit of indigence. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “To qualify for in forma pauperis status, a civil litigant must demonstrate both that the litigant is unable to pay court fees and that the claims he or she seeks to pursue are not frivolous.” Ogunsalu v. Nair, 117 F. App’x 522, 523 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1051 (2005). To meet the first prong of this test, a litigant must show that he or she “cannot because of his poverty pay or give security for the costs and still be able to provide himself and dependents with the necessities of life.” Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948) (internal alterations omitted).

9 The inconsistency in Plaintiff’s application renders the Court unable to determine his ability to pay. Plaintiff does not, for example, inform the Court how he pays for his monthly expenses or how he has acquired thousands of dollars in cash. Plaintiff should not, under these circumstances, be authorized to proceed IFP.

13 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause by September 15, 2023, why the Court should not recommend his IFP application be denied. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable Jamal N. Whitehead.

16 Dated this 8th day of September, 2023.

A 18 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge