Recinos v. City of Orting

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT TACOMA TIFFANY RECINOS, CASE NO. 23-5772 RJB □ Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING MOTION 13 CITY OF ORTING, et. al., 14 Defendants.

16 This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs “Motion Appointment of Counsel.”

17 || Dkt. 10. The Court has considered the pleadings filed regarding the motion and the remaining || record.

19 After a Report and Recommendation was adopted, Plaintiff's case was dismissed without || prejudice. Dkt. 6. Judgment was entered on October 12, 2023. Dkt. 7. The Plaintiff filed a || notice of appeal on October 16, 2023. Dkt. 8. In the instant motion, the Plaintiff moves for an || appointment of counsel because her “laptop was hacked and destroyed” as was her backup || laptop. Dkt. 10.

ORDER STRIKING MOTION - 1 1 “The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers || jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects || of the case involved in the appeal.” Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, || 58 (1982); see Schroeder v.McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458 (9th Cir. 1995).

5 The notice of appeal (Dkt. 12) relates to all claims and parties in this case. The Court no || longer has jurisdiction to consider motions in this case. Her motion (Dkt. 10) should be stricken.

7 It is ORDERED that: 8 e The Plaintiff's “Motion Appointment of Counsel” (Dkt. 10) IS STRICKEN.

9 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and ||to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.

11 Dated this 7 of December, 2023. > ’ 4 8 (plu Lowa 14 ROBERT J. BRYA) 15 United States Distfict Judge

ORDER STRIKING MOTION - 2