District Court, W.D. Washington, 2024

Ashemuke v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director

Ashemuke v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided January 22, 2024
Ashemuke v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director

Trial Court Opinion

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE EMMANUEL ASHEMUKE, 9 Petitioner, Case No. C23-1592-RSL 10 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 12 Respondent.

14 The Court, having reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner’s motion for temporary restraining order, the government’s response to petitioner’s motion, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge, petitioner’s objections thereto, and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS: 18 (1) The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted. Petitioner seeks a mandatory injunction. Even considering the new information submitted with petitioner’s objections, he has not shown that the Martinez factors, on balance, clearly favor a finding that petitioner’s § 1226(c) detention has become unreasonable. Martinez v. Clark, 2019 WL 5968089, at *6 (W.D. Wash. May 23, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, 2019 WL 5962685 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2019) (quoting Sajous v. Decker, 2018 WL 2357266, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. May 23, 2018), and collecting cases).

3 (2) Petitioner’s motion for temporary restraining order (dkt. # 8) is DENIED.

4 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, to counsel for Respondent, and to Judge Peterson.

7 Dated this 22nd day of January, 2024.

9 ROBERT S. LASNIK United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.