District Court, W.D. Washington, 2024

Northwest Carpenters Health and Security Trust v. Greyrock Drilling & Piledriving LLC

Northwest Carpenters Health and Security Trust v. Greyrock Drilling & Piledriving LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided January 29, 2024
Northwest Carpenters Health and Security Trust v. Greyrock Drilling & Piledriving LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 11 NORTHWEST CARPENTERS HEALTH CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00063-TL AND SECURITY TRUST et al., 12 ORDER ON MOTION FOR Plaintiffs, 13 v. SUPPLEMENTAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 GREYROCK DRILLING & PILEDRIVING LLC, a Washington limited 15 liability company; and DAVID SJOGREN, an individual, Defendants.

19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Default Judgment. Dkt. No. 24. Having reviewed the relevant record, the Court GRANTS the motion.

21 The Court assumes familiarity with the facts of this case. Relevant to this motion, the Court previously granted default judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants. See Dkt.

23 No. 20. As part of that Order, the Court also ordered Defendant Greyrock Drilling & Piledriving LLC (“Greyrock”) to “provide its monthly remittance reports for November 2022 to March 2023” to Plaintiffs. Id. at 7. Defendant Greyrock provided to Plaintiff the missing reports for November 1, 2022, through August 31, 2023. Dkt. No. 24 at 2. Defendant Greyrock inactivated its account effective September 1, 2023. Dkt. No. 25 (Fahey declaration) ¶ 21. For the months of November 2022 and January, April, and May 2023, the reports are unfunded—that is, contributions were not made. Id. ¶ 20; see also id. at 9–12 (unfunded reports). For all other months, Defendant Greyrock provided zero-hour reports. Id. ¶ 20.

7 Plaintiffs now bring the instant motion for a supplemental default judgment stemming from the missing reports. Dkt. No. 24. Plaintiffs seek a default judgment of $23,392.23 against Defendant Greyrock, consisting of: (1) $19,348.80 in fringe benefit contributions; (2) $2,098.67 in liquidated damages; and (3) $1,944.76 in accrued prejudgment interest. Dkt. No. 24 at 4–6; see Dkt. Nos. 27 (praecipe for claim summary detail), 27-1 (proposed order), 27-2 (proposed judgment). Plaintiffs also seek a default judgment of $2,552.04 against Defendant David Sjogren (president of Defendant Greyrock), who is jointly and severally liable for amounts withheld from employee paychecks ($834.00 for vacation contributions and $1,718.04 union dues) but not remitted to Plaintiffs. Id. Finally, Plaintiffs seek an award of $2,519.00 in attorney fees and post- judgment interest. Dkt. No. 24 at 6–7.

17 The Court substantially addressed the issues presented by a motion for default judgment in its prior Order and finds no reason to disturb its prior findings as to jurisdiction and the Eitel factors. See Dkt. No. 20 at 5. As to Plaintiffs’ new requests, the Court’s findings with regard to the Eitel factors apply with equal force to the additional payments being sought in the instant motion. Further, Plaintiffs have submitted sufficient evidence to confirm that the amounts listed above are indeed due under the relevant agreements. See Dkt. No. 25 at 9–12; see also Dkt.

23 No. 27 at 4–10 (summary and details by month).

1 Plaintiffs have also satisfied the criteria for entitlement to attorney fees set forth in Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975). Plaintiffs have provided a sufficiently precise accounting of these amounts. See Dkt. No. 26 (Maxwell declaration) ¶¶ 7–8; see also id. at 5–6 (fee report). Plaintiffs’ request appears reasonable in light of the experience and skill of counsel, the rates requested and hours expended, and the efforts as well as results achieved. Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to the attorney fees and costs requested.

7 Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Default Judgment is GRANTED. The Court DIRECTS entry of supplemental default judgment in the amounts requested and with post-judgment interest.

10 Dated this 29th day of January 2024.

A Tana Lin United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.