District Court, W.D. Washington, 2024

Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A. v. Kavo Platanos M/V

Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A. v. Kavo Platanos M/V
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided May 31, 2024
Aegean Maritime Petroleum S.A. v. Kavo Platanos M/V

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE AEGEAN MARITIME PETROLEUM S.A., CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00172-JHC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. # 138) v. KAVO PLATANOS M/V, ET AL., Defendant.

14 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Strike Allegations of the Third Amended Complaint and Motion to Make More Definite and Certain. Dkt. # 138.

16 Defendants seek to strike certain portions of Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (Dkt. # 137 at 2, 10) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). Dkt. # 138 at 3–4; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) (“The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.”). Defendants also contend that Defendant’s first and second claims for relief should be made more definite and certain under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). Dkt. # 138 at 4–6; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). (“A party may move for a more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed but which is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response.”). Plaintiff opposes. Dkt. # 141.

1 The Court has considered the materials filed in support of, and in opposition to, the || motion; the rest of the case file; and the governing law. Being fully advised and for the reasons outlined in Plaintiff's opposition (Dkt. # 141), the Court DENIES the motion (Dkt. # 138). See || also Chao Chen v. Geo Grp., Inc., 297 F. Supp. 3d 1130, 1132 (W.D. Wash. 2018) (Rule 12(f) || motions to strike are generally disfavored because the motions may be used as delay tactics and _ || because of the strong policy favoring resolution on the merits); McMillan v. Cpride Grp. LLC, || No. 2:21-CV-549-BJR, 2022 WL 1203741, at *7 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 22, 2022) (“Motions for a g || more definite statement are disfavored, and ordinarily restricted to situations where a pleading suffers from unintelligibility rather than want of detail.”) (citations and quotations omitted).

10 Dated this 31st day of May, 2024.

12 Chur 13 John H. Chun 4 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.