District Court, W.D. Washington, 2024

Hall v. Anderson

Hall v. Anderson
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided June 24, 2024
Hall v. Anderson

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JUNAID RAMSEY HALL , 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05455-LK-BAT 10 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL - ILENE ANDERSON, et al., DKT. 9 12 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff filed a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint on June 10, 2024, and on June 21, 2024, filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. 9.

15 There is generally no right to counsel in a civil action. See Campbell v. Burt, 141 F.3d 16 927, 931 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court may appoint counsel for indigent civil litigants under 28 17 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), but only under “exceptional circumstances.” Agyeman v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004). To determine if “exceptional circumstances” exist, the Court considers “the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).

22 Plaintiff contends the Court should appoint counsel because he cannot afford to hire counsel and each of the lawyers he contacted declined to take his case. These reasons apply to most requests for appointment of counsel and therefore are not exceptional circumstances. The complaint filed demonstrates Plaintiff has the ability to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. The complaint alleges Defendants violated Plaintiff’s rights by failing to adequately treat Plaintiff’s mental health issues. The allegations do not appear at this point to involve complex facts or law and it too early in the action to determine whether Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of his claims. Appointment of counsel is thus not presently justified, and the Court ORDERS: 8 1. The motion for appointment of counsel, Dkt. 5, is DENIED.

9 2. The Clerk shall provide a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

10 DATED this 24th day of June, 2024.

11 A BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.