District Court, W.D. Washington, 2024

Andrew v. Mayorkas

Andrew v. Mayorkas
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided December 20, 2024
Andrew v. Mayorkas

Trial Court Opinion

1 District Judge James L. Robart 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE RWANGOKO ANDREW, Case No. 2:24-cv-01375-JLR Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND 11 v. DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Noted for Consideration: December 20, 2024 13 Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Rwangoko Andrew and Defendants, through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 10(g) and 16, and hereby jointly stipulate and move for a 60-day extension of the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint. A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Continuing pretrial and trial dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). Good cause exists to extend Defendants’ response deadline to February 25, 2025.

22 Plaintiff brings this lawsuit pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and the Mandamus Act to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate the Forms I-730, Refugee/Asylee Relative Petitions, that Plaintiff filed on behalf of his wife and children in December 2018. With additional time, this case may be resolved without the need of further judicial intervention. The USCIS Nairobi Field Office interviewed the beneficiaries on December 18, 2024. The cases are now undergoing routine background and security vetting. If found eligible after the review, USCIS Nairobi Field Office will work to coordinate and complete medical examinations, request sponsorship assurances, and complete any final background checks and eligibility determinations. After the results are obtained and assuming none of the beneficiaries are subject to a medical ineligibility, then USCIS will request sponsorship assurances and complete any final security checks and eligibility determinations necessary to finalize processing.

10 Therefore, the parties agree to and propose that Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Complaint be extended to February 25, 2024 2025.

13 // // // // // // 1 DATED this 20th day of December, 2024.

2 Respectfully submitted, TESSA M. GORMAN SUMMIT LAW GROUP, PLLC United States Attorney s/ Michelle R. Lambert s/ Diana Siri Breaux MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 DIANA SIRI BREAUX, WSBA #46112 Assistant United States Attorney 315 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 1000 United States Attorney’s Office Seattle, Washington 98104 Western District of Washington Phone: (206) 676-7000 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 Email: [email protected] Tacoma, Washington 98402 Phone: (253) 428-3824 Fax: (253) 428-3826 PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER Email: [email protected] LLP Attorneys for Defendants 10 s/ Steven A. Zalesin I certify that this memorandum contains 263 STEVEN A. ZALESIN*, NYS #2070134 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules. s/ Stephanie Sofer 12 STEPHANIE SOFER*, NYS #5882477 13 s/ Emma Guido Brill EMMA GUIDO BRILL*, NYS #5562699 14 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 15 Phone: (212) 336-2000 Email: [email protected] 16 [email protected] [email protected] 17 * Pro Hac Vice Admitted 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to February 25, 2025. It is so ORDERED.

5 DATED this 20th day of December, 2024.

A JAMES L. ROBART 8 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.