Marshall v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE MARSHALL, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00254-JNW-MLP Petitioner, ORDER v. MASON, Respondent.

The Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Michelle L.

Peterson is before the Court. Dkt. No. 18. Petitioner Steven Maurice Marshall filed no objections to the R&R, and the time for filing objections has passed. Having considered the R&R, the remainder of the record, and the relevant law, the Court is satisfied that the R&R contains no errors of law and that there are no clear errors on the face of the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: • The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 18.

1 e The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Dkt. No. 5, is DENIED and 9 this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

3 e In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases 4 in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is 5 DENIED.

6 e The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and the 7 accompanying Judgment to Petitioner and to the Hon. Michelle L.

8 Peterson.

10 Dated this 3rd day of January, 2025.

11 bs □□□ 12 Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge