Thomas v. Bennett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JAMES EARL THOMAS, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05926-JNW-DWC Petitioner, ORDER v. JASON BENNETT, Respondent.

The Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge David W.

Christel is before the Court. Dkt. No. 3. Petitioner James Earl Thomas filed no objections to the R&R, and the time for filing objections has passed. Having considered the R&R, the remainder of the record, and the relevant law, the Court is satisfied that the R&R contains no errors of law and that there are no clear errors on the face of the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: • The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 3.

1 e This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure filing 9 deficiencies and failure to properly prosecute.

3 e The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and the 4 accompanying Judgment to Petitioner and to the Hon. David W.

5 Christel.

7 Dated this 3rd day of January, 2025.

8 ps Le— 9 Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge