Doe v. United States Department of Homeland Security

1 District Judge Tana Lin

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE JOHN DOE, Case No. 2:24-cv-01712-TL Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD 11 v. CASE IN ABEYANCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Noted for Consideration: 13 January 21, 2025 Defendants.

15 Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and move to stay these proceedings until July 25, 2025. Plaintiff brought this litigation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to schedule an interview and adjudicate his asylum application. Defendants’ response to the Complaint is currently due on January 27, 2025. The parties are currently working towards a resolution to this litigation. For good cause, the parties request that the Court hold the case in abeyance until July 25, 2025.

23 Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed. R. Civ. 3 P. 1.

4 With additional time, this case may be resolved without the need of further judicial intervention. USCIS has scheduled Plaintiff’s asylum interview for March 27, 2025. USCIS agrees to diligently work towards completing the adjudication within 120 days of the interview, absent unforeseen or exceptional circumstances that would require additional time for adjudication. If the adjudication is not completed within that time, USCIS will provide a status report to the Court. Plaintiff will submit all supplemental documents and evidence, if any, to USCIS seven to ten days prior to the interview date. Plaintiff recognizes that failure to submit documents prior to the interview may require the interview to be rescheduled and the adjudication delayed. If needed, Plaintiff will bring an interpreter to the interview, otherwise the interview will need to be rescheduled and the adjudication delayed. Once the application is adjudicated, Plaintiff will dismiss the case with each party to bear their own litigation costs and attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the parties request this abeyance to allow USCIS to conduct Plaintiff’s asylum interview and then process his asylum application.

17 As additional time is necessary for this to occur, the parties request that the Court hold the case in abeyance until July 25, 2025. The parties will submit a status update on or before July 25, 2025.

20 // // // 1 DATED this 21st day of January, 2025.

2 Respectfully submitted, TESSA M. GORMAN COUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC United States Attorney RELATIONS, 4 WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER s/ Michelle R. Lambert MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 s/ Anessa Novasio Assistant United States Attorney ANESSA NOVASIO WSBA#44294 United States Attorney’s Office Council on American Islamic Relations, Western District of Washington Washington State Chapter 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 1511 Third Avenue, Suite 788 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Seattle, Washington 98101 Phone: (253) 428-3824 Phone: 206-384-8432 Fax: (253) 428-3826 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants I certify that this memorandum contains 395 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 The case is held in abeyance until July 25, 2025. The parties shall submit a status update on or before July 25, 2025. It is so ORDERED.

4 .

6 DATED this 21st day of January, 2025.

A Tana Lin United States District Judge