District Court, E.D. Washington, 2025

Shavers v. Prentice-Hall Corp System

Shavers v. Prentice-Hall Corp System
District Court, E.D. Washington · Decided January 24, 2025
Shavers v. Prentice-Hall Corp System

Trial Court Opinion

1 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 Jan 24, 2025 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON K L SHAVERS, for minor child C.S., No. 2:24-CV-00300-SAB 10 Plaintiffs 11 v. ORDER DISMISSING MATTER THE PRENTICE HALL CORP. WITH PREJUDICE SYSTEM; and WALGREENS COMPANIES 12 E EMPIRE AVE., SPOKANE, WA 99207, 16 Defendants.

18 Before the Court is Defendants’ Notice of Noncompliance, ECF No. 20, noting Plaintiff failed to respond to this Court’s December 19, 2024, Order, ECF No. 19, directing Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute by January 10, 2025. Plaintiff is pro se. Defendants are represented by James King.

23 Plaintiff failed to meet the Court’s deadline and has not filed a response to the Order. The Court has an interest in managing its docket and the prompt resolution of civil matters. See Destfino v. Reiswig, 630 F.3d 952, 959 (9th Cir. 2011). In considering a dismissal, the Court looks at factors including risk of prejudice to the defendants, public interest in a timely resolution, and the management of the Court’s docket. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642– 1|| 44 (9th Cir. 2002). Those factors weight in favor of dismissal here.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and LCivR 41(b)(1), the Court now 3|| dismisses this matter for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s December 19, 2024, Order. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 5|| 1992). A dismissal under Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: l. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.

8 2. The District Court Executive shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

10 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to 11|| file this Order, provide copies to counsel and Plaintiff by mail at the address on file, and close the file.

13 DATED this 24th day of January 2025.

18 Su £ 7 C iin 19 Stanley A. Bastian 0 Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.