Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. Asplund

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY CASE NO. 3:25-cv-05322-JHC INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER Plaintiff, v. JOANNA ASPLUND; ROBERT HARRIS; JH KELLY LLC, Defendants.

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company’s complaint, Dkt. # 1, and concludes that it does not establish subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Plaintiff asserts that the Court’s jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, 28 18 U.S.C. § 1332. Id. at 2. For purposes of assessing diversity jurisdiction, a court must consider the domicile of all members of a limited liability company. Johnson v. Columbia Props.

Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). Plaintiff does not identify the members of Defendant JH Kelly LLC or their domiciles.

1 Thus, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. If Plaintiff fails to provide the court with the information described above within seven (7) days of this order, the case will be dismissed without prejudice.

4 Dated this 28th day of April, 2025.

6 a John H. Chun United States District Judge