District Court, E.D. Washington, 2025

Smith v. Neau

Smith v. Neau
District Court, E.D. Washington · Decided May 16, 2025
Smith v. Neau

Trial Court Opinion

FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 May 16, 2025 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON JESS RICHARD SMITH, NO: 4:25-CV-5026-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 9 v. J. NEAU, CUS HICKS, LT.

ROBINETTE, OLAJUAN JONES #896455, MISS JACKSON, and SAMANTHA GRISWOLD, Defendants.

14 BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff Jess Richard Smith’s “Show Cause Affidavit of Physical Imminent Danger and Harm,” ECF No. 10, which the Court construes as his Response to the Order to Show Cause why he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, is proceeding pro se; Defendants have not been served.

1 In his Response, Plaintiff states that he is seeking “Medical Treatment ‘to repair broken fractured bones’.” ECF No. 10 at 2. He contends that “Coyote Ridge Correctional Officials have refused to treat Diagnosed Physical Injuries and allow money on my Inmate Savings Account to be sent out to pay for court fees.” Id. 5 Plaintiff again references events that occurred and injuries he sustained (i.e., a broken finger) in 2022, claiming it never healed properly. Id. at 3–4. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertions, this does not show that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury when he presented his Complaint on March 12, 2025. See Ray v. Lara, 31 F.4th 692, 701 (9th Cir. 2022). He presents no facts disputing the existence of three or more “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Consequently, Plaintiff may not proceed in forma paupers. Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007).

13 Having granted Plaintiff the opportunity to pay the filing fee, and without verification that he is currently legally entitled to money in his Inmates Savings Account, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914.

17 // // // // 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment, forward a 2|| copy to Plaintiff and close the file. The Court certifies any appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.

4 DATED May 16, 2025. | @ ue wre United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.