Niczyporuk v. Todd

1 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Aug 22, 2025 4 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 10 No. 2:24-CV-00356-SAB In re: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO JAROSLAW NICZYPORUK ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT 17 Before the Court is Appellant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) and for Relief under Rule 60(b), ECF No. 20. The motion was heard without oral argument. Appellant Jaroslaw Niczyporuk is representing himself in this matter. U.S Bank Trust National Association is represented by Eric Marshack and Daniel Ross.

22 Mr. Niczyporuk challenges the Court’s Order dismissing his appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s September 30, 2024 Order because the notice of appeal was not filed within 14 days. Additionally, the Court found that Mr. Niczyporuk’s appeal was without merit and appeared to be brought with the intent to hinder, delay and defraud creditors. The current motion suffers from the same fate.

27 Mr. Niczyporuk has failed to establish any factual or legal basis for reversing the Bankruptcy Court’s orders or this Court’s Order. See Kona 1|| Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop. 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 3 l. Appellant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) and for Relief under Rule 60(b), ECF No. 20, is DENIED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order, forward copies to Plaintiff and counsel, and close the file.

DATED this 22nd day of August 2025. , 4S C > .

10 hin Cus tar Il Chief United States District Judge ORDER NENVING MOTION TO AT TER OR AMEND) JIIDGMENT ~9