Ayala v. Noem
Trial Court Opinion
1 District Judge Jamal N. Whitehead 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT TACOMA ARTURO SEPULVEDA AYALA, Case No. 3:25-cv-05185-JNW Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD 11 v. CASE IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER KRISTI NOEM, et al., Noted for Consideration: 13 Defendants. August 26, 2025 15 For good cause, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants,1 by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and move to stay these proceedings through October 26, 2025. Plaintiff brought this litigation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and the Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to issue a wait-list determination on his Form I-918, Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status, and to adjudicate his Form I-192, Application for Advance Permission to Enter as a Nonimmigrant. This Court has issued an initial scheduling order. Dkt. No. 26. The parties are currently working towards a resolution to this litigation.
24 1 Undersigned counsel does not represent Defendant Bruce Scott.
1 Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed. R. Civ. 5 P. 1.
6 With additional time, this case may be resolved without the need of further judicial intervention. After a review of the current administrative record, USCIS determined that it needs additional evidence prior to adjudicating Plaintiff’ Form I-918 or Form I-192. USCIS issued requests for evidence (“RFEs”) and Plaintiff has until October 26, 2025, to respond to the RFEs.
10 USCIS cannot complete the adjudication until Plaintiff’s RFE responses are received and USCIS reviews the responses. Thus, the parties believe that an extension is warranted in this instance.
12 Pursuant to this Court’s Order Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus in Plaintiff’s companion habeas litigation, Plaintiff has been released from immigration detention. Sepulveda Ayala v. Bondi, 2:25-cv-1063-JNW, Dkt. Nos. 23, 24. In the Order, the Court found that the deferred action that Plaintiff was granted pursuant to USCIS’s bona fide determination prevents his removal. Order, at 6-9. While USCIS has issued a Notice of Intent to Revoke (“NOIR”) Plaintiff’s employment authorization and terminate his deferred action, USCIS intends to wait until Plaintiff’s RFE responses for his Form I-918 and Form I-192 are evaluated before taking further action concerning the NOIR. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to stay this litigation until Plaintiff’s deadline for the RFE responses as Plaintiff’s deferred action remains in place until USCIS takes further action.
22 Accordingly, the parties request that the Court hold the case in abeyance until October 26, 2025. The parties will submit a joint status report on or before October 26, 2025. The parties further request that the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement be vacated. Dkt. No. 26.
3 DATED this 26th day of August, 2025.
4 Respectfully submitted, TEAL LUTHY MILLER GIBBS HOUSTON PAUW Acting United States Attorney s/ Michelle R. Lambert s/ Kelly Vomacka MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 KELLY VOMACKA, WSBA# 20090 Assistant United States Attorney Gibbs Houston Pauw United States Attorney’s Office 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1600 Western District of Washington Seattle, Washington 98104-1003 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 Phone: 206-682-1080 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Email: [email protected] Phone: (253) 428-3800 Attorneys for Plaintiff Fax: (253) 428-3826 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Federal Defendants I certify that this memorandum contains 459 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.
1 ORDER 2 The case is held in abeyance until October 26, 2025. The parties shall submit a status |Jupdate on or before October 26, 2025. The Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status ||Report, and Early Settlement (Dkt. No. 26) is vacated.
5 It is so ORDERED.
7 DATED this 27th day of August, 2025.
10 sin N. WHITEHEAD nited States District Judge STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY AND ORDER 1201 PACIFIC AVE., STE. 700
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.