Coghill v. Gerber Payroll Services
Trial Court Opinion
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE KENNETH COGHILL, et al., 8 Plaintiff, Case No. C25-0759-SKV 9 v. ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT GERBER PAYROLL SERVICES, et al., 11 Defendant.
13 Plaintiffs timely filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint, Dkt. 26, as provided for in the Court’s Order dated August 15, 2025, Dkt. 25. Because an amended pleading supersedes an original or prior amended pleading, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 19, targeting the now “‘non-existent’” First Amended Class Action Complaint, is properly deemed moot. Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoted source omitted). The Court, as such, herein STRIKES the Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 19, as moot.
19 Dated this 25th day of September, 2025.
A 21 S. KATE VAUGHAN United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.