Stephanie Agnew, Felisa Bryant, Deborah Cerkezoglu, Aza Zhambekova, and Shawna...

5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON STEPHANIE AGNEW, FELISA BRYANT, Case No. 2:25-cv-02006 DEBORAH CERKEZOGLU, AZA ZHAMBEKOVA, and SHAWNA STUMP, on their own behalf and on behalf of others STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO similarly situated, EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 10 Plaintiffs, NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: 11 v. October 20, 2025 MACY’S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant.

15 Under Western District of Washington Local Rules 7 and 10, Plaintiffs Stephanie Agnew, Felisa Bryant, Deborah Cerkezoglu, Aza Zhambekova, and Shawna Stump, and their Counsel of Record, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC (“Defendant”), together (the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above- captioned action is extended for a total of fifty-one (51) days to December 5, 2025.

21 A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Indeed, modifying or extending a responsive deadline is within the discretion of the trial judge. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).

24 Good cause exists for the extension of Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint. This case was removed to this Court on October 15, 2025. Counsel for Defendant was only recently retained and seeks additional time to understand the complex allegations and determine the path forward for this litigation. Accordingly, the Parties request that the Court extend Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to December 5, 2025. The Parties have not made any previous requests to extend this deadline.

4 The Parties further stipulate and request that should Defendant file a Motion to Dismiss in response to the Complaint, the Court enter the following briefing schedule: 6 a. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be due January 9, 2026; and 7 b. Defendant’s Reply shall be due February 6, 2026.

Dated: October 21, 2025 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Meegan B. Brooks MEEGAN B. BROOKS (WA 62516) 11 BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP 12 100 Pine Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, CA 94111 13 Telephone: 628.600.2232 Email: [email protected] 15 Attorney for Defendant Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC Dated: October 21, 2025 /s/ Michael C. Tackeff LYNN A. TOOPS NATALIE A. LYONS 19 IAN R. BENSBERG COHENMALAD, LLP 20 One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 21 Telephone: (317) 636-6481 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] J. GERARD STRANCH, IV 24 MICHAEL C. TACKEFF STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC 25 223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 27 Email: [email protected] 1 Email: [email protected] 2 SAMUEL J. STRAUSS RAINA C. BORRELLI STRAUSS BORRELLI, LLP 4 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610 Chicago, IL 60611 5 Telephone: (872) 263-1100 Email: [email protected] 6 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Stephanie Agnew, 8 Felisa Bryant, Deborah Cerkezoglu, Aza Zhambekova, and Shawna Stump 1 ORDER 2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 Dated this 21st day of October, 2025.

5 C]ok 4%. Chur 6 John H. Chun United States District Judge 28 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 4