District Court, W.D. Washington, 2025

Bobby Darrell Colbert v. Karen Arnold

Bobby Darrell Colbert v. Karen Arnold
District Court, W.D. Washington · Decided October 23, 2025
Bobby Darrell Colbert v. Karen Arnold

Trial Court Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT TACOMA BOBBY DARRELL COLBERT, CASE NO. C25-1768-JCC Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. KAREN ARNOLD, 13 Respondent.

15 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s objection (Dkt. No. 7) to the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 6). Judge Fricke R&R recommends that Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and motions for leave for certificate and requests for judicial notice be denied. (See id. at 5–6.) Petitioner’s objections (Dkt. No. 7) are not responsive to the analysis or conclusions contained within the R&R and, therefore, do not trigger this Court’s review of the R&R.1 A district court only reviews those portions of an R&R to which a party properly objects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Objections are required to enable the court to “focus attention on those issues—factual and legal—that are at the heart of the parties’ dispute.”

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985). The court is not required to review “any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Id. at 149. Said another way, for an objection to be proper, it must point to specific error contained within the R&R. See, e.g., United States v. Diaz-Lemus, 1 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 2 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

3 2. The Petition for Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1-2) is DISMISSED without prejudice 4 for lack of jurisdiction.

5 3. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 1), proposed motions 6 seeking leave for certificate (Dkt. Nos. 1-4), and requests for judicial notice (Dkt.

7 No. 1-5) are DENIED as moot.

8 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

10 DATED this 23rd day of October 2025.

A John C. Coughenour 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2010 WL 2573748, slip op. at 1 (D. Ariz. 2010); Djelassi v. ICE Field Office Director, 434 F.

26 Supp. 3d 917, 919 (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.