Washington Supreme Court, 1891

Clark v. Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court · Decided March 7, 1891 · No. 104 · Anders, Bcott, Dunbar, Hoyt, Stiles

2 Wash. 203; 26 P. 253; 1891 Wash. LEXIS 32

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

Burson v. Jensen (Wash. 1925)
Snead v. Coleman (Va. 1851)
Hook v. Turnbull (Va. Ct. App. 1806)
Town of Camden ex rel. Mollohan v. O'Brien (W. Va. 1953)
Galloway v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1943)
Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n v. Clark (Wash. 1894)
Richmond & Danville R. R. v. Williams (Va. 1889)
Clark's Adm'r v. R. & D. R. R. (Va. 1884)
Richmond & Danville R. R. v. Moore's Adm'r. (Va. 1883)
Johnson v. Gibbons (Va. 1876)
Johnson v. Gibbons (Va. 1876)
Johnson v. Gibbons (Va. 1876)
Muhleman v. National Insurance Co. (W. Va. 1873)
Roderick v. Railroad Co. (W. Va. 1873)
Davis' Adm'rs v. Mead (Va. 1856)
Ellis v. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati 1854)
Green v. Judith (Va. 1827)
Malone v. Donnally (Ala. 1820)
Rutgers v. Lucet (New York Supreme Court 1800)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dunbar, J.

— This cause was brought here on substantially the same allegation of error, and involves the same questions raised and discussed in the case of Reed v. Association, ante, p. 198; and for the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case the judgment in this case will be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial in accordance therewith, with leave to amend pleadings.

Hoyt and Bcott, JJ., concur. Anders, C. J., concurs in the result. Stiles, J., disqualified.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.