Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff
Washington Supreme Court
Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff, 4 Wash. 260 (Wash. 1892)
29 P. 936; 1892 Wash. LEXIS 209
Stiles
Tacoma Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wolff
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The appellants, after the transcript and the briefs of both sides are on file, move to dismiss the appeal. The respondent having moved to dismiss in its brief, under rule 22, objects that the motion now made should not be heard. “We do not think the rule should be interpreted to take from the appellants the right to control their case, and the motion is therefore granted.
Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, Scott and Hoyt, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tacoma Lumber and Manufacturing Company v. Samuel Wolff
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL — RIGHT TO DISMISS. Rule 22 of the supreme court, providing that a motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal must be stated in his brief, and will be heard at the time the canse is assigned on the calendar, cannot be construed as taking away the appellant’s right to dismiss his appeal at any time.