Lacey v. North Olympia Land Co.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hartwell v. C. Ganahl Lumber Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1908)
- Farnham v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1908)
- West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co. (2d Cir. 1897)
- Cooper v. Mattheys (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania 1842)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The failure to file appellant’s brief is sought to be excused in this case by a statement that the only ground of error intended to be raised was the insufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action. The statute and rule 12 are cited as authority for this proposition. But we cannot accept it. The appellant’s brief, even if it contained nothing but the statement of the case, required by rule 8, must be on file before the cause can be placed upon the calendar, under rule 9.
The motion, therefore, prevails, and the appeal will be dismissed.
Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, Hoyt and Scott, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.