Miller v. Washington Southern Railway Co.
Miller v. Washington Southern Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This action was brought by the respondent to recover on two promissory notes for $5,000 each, purporting to have been executed by the Satsop Railroad Company on the 10th of November, 1890, by J. R. McDonald and A. H. Anderson, president and secretary of said company, each of whom also indorsed said notes in a personal capacity.
The Satsop Railroad Company was a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and was engaged in the construction and operation of a railroad. The plaintiff was the holder of two hundred and fifty shares of $100 each of the capital stock of said railroad company, and on the date aforesaid sold said stock to said corporation, acting by its president and secretary afore
The questions raised are practically resolved into two. It is urged that the president and secretary of said corporation had no authority to execute or issue the notes in question; and it is further urged that the notes were without consideration, on the ground that the corporation could not become a purchaser of its own capital stock.
In support of the first proposition, it is urged that this case is governed by Elwell v. Puget Sound, etc., R. R. Co., 7 Wash. 487 (35 Pac. 376), and it may be doubtful whether there is any distinguishing feature in this case sufficient to except it from the one cited. It does appear, however, that said sum of eight thousand dollars in money had been paid to the plaintiff upon the transfer of the stock, which was prior to the purchase of the property of the Satsop Railroad Company by the Washington Southern Railway Company. And it further appears that for something more than two years after the transaction aforesaid, which was shown by the books of the company, no one questioned the validity of said proceedings. If these facts are not sufficient to except it from the rule laid down in Elwell v. Puget Sound, etc., R. R. Co., supra, then it is at least questionable whether the decision in that case does not conflict with several former decisions of this court hereinafter mentioned,
Affirmed.
Dunbar, Anders and Gordon, JJ., concur.
Hoyt, C. J., concurs in the result.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mary M. Miller v. Washington Southern Railway Company
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- CORPORATIONS—LEGALITY OF CONTRACTS—ESTOPPEL. - Where the president and secretary of a corporation, without authorization of the board of directors, have purchased the shares of a stockholder for the benefit of the corporation, giving in part payment therefor funds of the corporation and executing its notes for the balance, and such action has been acquiesced in for more, than two years, and in effect ratified by a sale of all the corporate property, including the stock in question, to another corporation, which took with full knowledge of the transaction, the objection cannot be raised that the officers of the former corporation acted beyond the scope of their authority in the issuance of the notes.