Laurendeau v. Fugelli

Washington Supreme Court
Laurendeau v. Fugelli, 16 Wash. 367 (Wash. 1897)
47 P. 759; 1897 Wash. LEXIS 324

Laurendeau v. Fugelli

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss this appeal will have to be sustained. Passing the form of the bond, which in no manner describes or attempts to describe the judgment which is sought to be appealed from, the record shows that the judgment of non-suit was granted on the 13th day of September, 1893, but was not entered until the 11th day of September, 1894, when, on motion of plaintiff, the judgment was entered nunc pro tunc. On the 8th day of September, three days before the entry of the same, the appeal bond above referred to was executed, but the notice of appeal was not given until the 12th day of September, 1894, four days after the filing of the bond. The appeal will therefore be dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
P. Laurendeau v. Peter Fugelli
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL — BOND PREMATURELY FILED. An appeal is ineffectual, where notice of appeal is not given until after the filing of the bond, the latter having in fact been filed prior to the entry of the judgment appealed from.