Winters v. Gray's Harbor Boom Co.
Winters v. Gray's Harbor Boom Co.
Opinion of the Court
From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor the Gray’s Harbor Boom Company, one of the. defendants, gave notice of appeal. The notice was not served'upon its co-defendants, Burrows and Stockwell, who had appeared in the action. Thereafter the last named defendants joined in the appeal bond but did not serve an independent notice of appeal or join in the appeal by filing with the clerk of the superior court a statement to that effect.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John Winters v. Gray's Harbor Boom Company
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL — JOINDER IN NOTICE — JURISDICTION OP APPEAL. Where a party to an action appeals without serving notice upon his. co-defendants, the action of the parties not served in later joining in the appeal bond, but neglecting to join in the appeal by statement filed with the clerk or to serve an independent notice of appeal, will not confer jurisdiction upon the supreme court, under Laws 1893, p. 121, § 5 (Bal. Code, § 6504) governing notice in cases where parties similarly affected desire to appeal.