Loy v. Coey

Washington Supreme Court
Loy v. Coey, 31 Wash. 684 (Wash. 1903)
71 P. 552; 1903 Wash. LEXIS 694
Pee

Loy v. Coey

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

— The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the alleged appeal hond is ineffectual, in that the penalty of said bond, which purports to be an appeal and supersedeas bond, is not double the amount of the judgment and $200, required by the statute for bond on appeal. This case falls squarely within the rule announced in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 (54 Pac. 999); Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214); Galloway v. Tjossem, 22 Wash. 163 (60 Pac. 129); Beezley v. Sessions, 22 Wash. 125 (60 Pac. 130); and Graham v. American Surely Co., 28 Wash. 735 (69 Pac. 365).

The motion will be sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
C. A. Loy v. C. P. Coey
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published