Johnson v. Douglas
Johnson v. Douglas
Opinion of the Court
Appellant brought this action in the superior court of Spokane county to recover the sum of $500 deposited with the respondent.
Prom the record it appears that- a criminal charge was pending in the courts of British Columbia against this appellant for the alleged seduction of one Amanda Povolo. That for the purpose of nullifying and setting at naught said criminal proceedings this appellant connived and bargained with the said Amanda Povolo to that end, and induced her to accompany him to Spokane, where he made the deposit of the sum named with respondent, “to he paid to Amanda Povolo in the event and when the cause
The object of such deposit was to defeat a regular proceeding in a court of justice, and is, therefore, void, as against public policy. Courts will not lend their aid to enforce such contracts (Standard Furniture Co. v. Van Alstine, 22 Wash. 670, 62 Pac. 145, 51 L. R. A. 889, 79 Am. St. Rep. 960), nor to assist a party to rescind such a contract after he has received its benefits.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.