Pyle v. Starbird
Pyle v. Starbird
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, as executor of the estate of Emma Starbird, deceased, brought this action against the respondent to recover the sum of $850, alleged to have been loaned the respondent by Mrs. Starbird in her lifetime. After issue had been joined on the complaint, a trial was had by the court sitting without a jury, and resulted in findings and a judgment for the respondent, from which the executor appeals.
From the record, it appears that Mrs. Starbird, some months preceding her death, remitted to the respondent by check the money for which the administrator sues. No writing passed between the parties showing the purpose of the remittance, but Mrs. Starbird afterwards claimed that the remittance was a loan, and placed the claim in the hands of her counsel for collection. Under the advice of her counsel, a letter was written to the respondent demanding payment.
The judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Frank Pyle, as etc. v. John H. Starbird
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Money Loaned — Evidence—Sufficiency. The fact that plaintiff’s decedent remitted a check to the defendant does not create a presumption that the money was loaned, and an implied promise to repay is not thereby created and will not be found from the fact that decedent in her lifetime commenced an action to recover the same, where defendant’s contention that it was to repay advances and for services rendered was supported by the testimony of several persons who were witnesses to the transactions.