State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court
State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Superior Court, 72 Wash. 478 (Wash. 1913)
130 P. 753; 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1492

State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Superior Court

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Relators have applied for a write of mandate commanding the superior court for King county to fix a supersedeas bond, pending an appeal from the order of the superior court directing the county commissioners of King county to select and appoint a road supervisor from a list of names furnished by the Mercer Island Good Roads Association, the application for such appointment being made under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 5578.

We think this case is controlled by Cooper v. Hindley, 70 Wash. 331, 126 Pac. 916. In denying the application for a writ, it may be understood that we do not pass upon the merits of the controversy. The right of the commissioners to litigate the questions raised in the principal proceedings is not foreclosed, but pending that determination it is their duty to abide the judgment of the lower court. A statute declaratory of public interest should not be construed so as to defeat or suspend its operation pending an appeal, unless the right of the parties litigant can be kept in statu quo or the damages, if ascertainable, compensated in money.

Writ denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State of Washington, on the Relation of the Board of County Commissioners of King County v. The Superior Court for King County
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal — Supersedeas—Right To. Supersedeas is not a matter of right pending an appeal from an order directing the county commissioners to appoint a road supervisor from a list of names furnished by a good roads association, pursuant to Rem. & Bal. Code, § 5578, there being no right to a supersedeas in matters of public interest unless the parties can be kept in statu quo, or the damages compensated in money.