Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Opinion of the Court
On Petition eor Modification.
By motion and affidavit, which have here been considered as a petition for rehearing, it is suggested that a further direction than that contained in the original opinion (84 Wash. 88, 146 Pac. 881), be given to the superior court in this: That in case the respondent shall, un
In the event the respondent redeems from the assessment liens, or any of them, the superior court, upon a proper showing, is directed to enter a supplemental decree, including in the amount due the respondent under the mortgage the sum paid in redemption of assessment liens.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.