Washington Supreme Court, 1917

Hutchinson Co. v. Fahey

Hutchinson Co. v. Fahey
Washington Supreme Court · Decided December 5, 1917
99 Wash. 165; 168 P. 1139; 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1027

Hutchinson Co. v. Fahey

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from the order of the lower court granting the motion of defendant to strike certain *166words, phrases and paragraphs from the plaintiff’s complaint. No judgment of dismissal or other final judgment has been entered in the cause, nor does it appear that the appellant refused to plead further, nor that the order granting the motion determined the particular matter in issue. We have repeatedly held that such an order is not appealable. Durk v. Scully, 41 Wash. 357, 83 Pac. 426; Methow Canal Co. v. Barton, 71 Wash. 401, 128 Pac. 627; Virtue v. Stanley, 79 Wash. 87, 139 Pac. 764.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.