In re Chartrand
In re Chartrand
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner, on June 8, 1917, was complained against as a delinquent minor. A hearing was had upon this complaint in the petitioner’s absence, and an order was made finding her to be a delinquent and committing her to an institution. On March 7, 1918, the petitioner, by writs of habeas corpus sued out in both Chelan and King counties, sought her release from such institution. The writs having been denied, appeals were taken to this court- and were disposed of in In re Chartrand, 103 Wash. 36, 173 Pac. 728.
After the judgment of this court was pronounced, holding that the superior court of Chelan county had
In our opinion, the section referred to does not cover complaints or petitions brought under the provisions of the juvenile act, but refers to criminal prosecutions. The petitioner was proceeded against under Rem. Code, § 1987-1, par. 6, being a portion of the act referring to juveniles. The court sitting for the determination of the writ of habeas corpus, at the same time had power to act as a court in juvenile matters, and was at liberty to treat petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus as an application in the nature of a motion for a change of custody. That the court has this dual capacity has been held by us in State ex rel. De Bit v. Mackintosh, 98 Wash. 438, 167 Pac. 1090; State ex rel. De Bit v. Superior Court, 103 Wash. 183, 173 Pac. 1014, and In re Rising, 104 Wash. 581, 177 Pac. 351.
The appeal is dismissed.
' Holcomb, C. J., Main, Tolman, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re Louise Chartrand
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Infants (4)—Custody of Delinquents — Proceedings. Rem. Code, § 2312, requiring the dismissal of prosecutions where the accused is not brought to trial within sixty days, applies only to criminal prosecutions, and not to proceedings against a delinquent child, under Rem. Code, § 1987-1, par. 6, of the juvenile act. Same (4)—Proceedings—Power of Court—Habeas Corpus. The superior court, sitting for the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a minor charged to be a delinquent child, has power to act as a court in juvenile matters and may treat the application as a motion for a change of custody.