State ex rel. Hanson v. Superior Court
State ex rel. Hanson v. Superior Court
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari to review the order of necessity in a condemnation by the state of a short strip of land for the construction of a part of the Inland Empire Highway.
Chapter 32, p. 116, § 1, Laws of 1921, amending § 5872 Rem. Code, provides:
“In case of condemnation to secure such lands, tbe action shall be brought in tbe name of tbe state . . . and in such action tbe selection of tbe lands by tbe supervisor of highways shall, in the absence of bad faith, arbitrary, capricious or fraudulent action, be conclusive upon the court and judge before which the action is brought that said lands are necessary for the purpose sought.” (Italics ours.)
Order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State of Washington, on the Relation of William Hanson v. The Superior Court for Yakima County
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Eminent Domain (39) — Necessity fob Appropriation — Evidence —Sufficiency. Necessity for tbe appropriation of land for a public highway is established in condemnation proceedings by evidence showing the purpose is to avoid two bad curves, thereby decreasing the length of the highway, preventing bad curvature, and avoiding considerable congestion.