Sisson v. Harvey

Washington Supreme Court
Sisson v. Harvey, 123 Wash. 650 (Wash. 1923)
212 P. 1052; 1923 Wash. LEXIS 785

Sisson v. Harvey

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appeal bond in this case was not given by the appellants to the adverse party to the judgment and is therefore ineffectual. Bruhn v. Steffins, 66 Wash. 144, 199 Pac. 29. The situation is unfortunately such that an amended bond cannot be filed, and the benefit of § 1730-9, Rem. Comp. Stat. is not available. Mogelberg v. Calhoun, 94 Wash. 662, 163 Pac. 29; Salvino v. Taylor Mill Co., 102 Wash. 507, 173 Pac. 433; Den Bleyker v. King County, 108 Wash. 687, 185 Pac. 613.

For that reason the appeal must be dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kenneth Sisson v. Charles H. Harvey, Security Benefit Association
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published